[Smoke & Mirrors]
How do you attempt to keep the ‘narrative’ in play [control the ‘sheep’]?
Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee said Friday they are proceeding with what they called an “impeachment investigation,” as they insisted former Special Counsel Robert Mueller delivered damning testimony against President Trump in this week’s hearing despite concerns from many on the left that his appearance was faltering and broke little new ground.
Nadler called the grand jury materials
for their investigation.
Does Nadler understand that the ‘critically important’ material requested would be illegal for AG Barr to disclose?
Democrats will complain, but the attorney general can’t be faulted for following the law. In disclosing the Mueller report, Attorney General William P. Barr will have to redact grand-jury information. That is the upshot of the ruling today by a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C.
“This means Attorney General Barr must redact grand-jury material from the Mueller report before disclosing it to Congress. Democrats will complain long and loud about this, but I don
t see how Barr can be reasonably faulted for following the law. Congress, after all, has the power to legislate an amendment to Rule 6(e) that would permit disclosure of grand-jury materials from a special counsel investigation to appropriate congressional committees.”
Will members of the D party Congress attempt to amend Rule 6(e) in order to obtain grand jury material deemed ‘critically important’?
Logical thinking, why?
Why paint a narrative that the one item you cannot possess is the one item you need in order to justify your argument?
People elected ‘knowingly’ spreading false-information [disinformation]?
Puppets follow orders.
Think for yourself.
This post was created with our easy submission form. Create your post!